<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lyle Backenroth &#187; Wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/tag/wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Practical attacks on WEP &amp; WPA (published).</title>
		<link>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2009/01/04/practical-attacks-on-wep-wpa-published/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=practical-attacks-on-wep-wpa-published</link>
		<comments>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2009/01/04/practical-attacks-on-wep-wpa-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Practical attacks on WEP &#38; WPA, including WPA packet injection:
Details (PDF): http://tinyurl.com/56j63s.
More here: http://tinyurl.com/8erk74.
From the site:
The attack is essentially a variant of the chopchop attack used against WEP secured networks, which surfaced in early 2005. The name &#8220;chopchop attack&#8221; is a nod to the KoreK-developed chopchop tool, which allows the user to decrypt an arbitrary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="entry-content">Practical attacks on WEP &amp; WPA, including WPA packet injection:</span></p>
<p><span class="entry-content">Details (PDF): <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tinyurl.com/56j63s" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/56j63s</a>.</span></p>
<p><span class="entry-content">More here: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://tinyurl.com/8erk74" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/8erk74</a></span>.</p>
<p>From the site:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The attack is essentially a variant of the <a rel="external" href="http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?id=korek_chopchop" target="_blank">chopchop attack</a> used against WEP secured networks, which surfaced in early 2005. The name &#8220;chopchop attack&#8221; is a nod to the KoreK-developed chopchop tool, which allows the user to decrypt an arbitrary encrypted data packet without having to know the WEP key.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2009/01/04/practical-attacks-on-wep-wpa-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA (wifi encryption) is still weak and easy to crack (as expected)</title>
		<link>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/12/06/wpa-wifi-encryption-is-still-weak-and-easy-to-crack-as-expected/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wpa-wifi-encryption-is-still-weak-and-easy-to-crack-as-expected</link>
		<comments>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/12/06/wpa-wifi-encryption-is-still-weak-and-easy-to-crack-as-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 03:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a good article on the subject.
Here&#8217;s also a good HowTo crack WPA.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.itworld.com/security/57285/once-thought-safe-wpa-wi-fi-encryption-cracked" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a good article on the subject.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://docs.lucidinteractive.ca/index.php/Cracking_WEP_and_WPA_Wireless_Networks" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s also a good HowTo crack WPA.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/12/06/wpa-wifi-encryption-is-still-weak-and-easy-to-crack-as-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPA / WPA2 &#8230; as insecure as I expected</title>
		<link>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/05/10/wpa-wpa2-as-insecure-as-i-expected/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=wpa-wpa2-as-insecure-as-i-expected</link>
		<comments>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/05/10/wpa-wpa2-as-insecure-as-i-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lyle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireless encryption stinks. It always has. Generally, the way I secure my wireless is first to engage MAC filtering (not at all secure, but at least filters out the newbies), then I engage an SSH tunnel to a trusted box @ home with the dynamic application-level port forwarding which allows the SSH server to act [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless encryption stinks. It always has. Generally, the way I secure my wireless is first to engage MAC filtering (not at all secure, but at least filters out the newbies), then I engage an SSH tunnel to a trusted box @ home with the dynamic application-level port forwarding which allows the SSH server to act as a SOCKS proxy (<strong>ssh -D 1655 validusername@ssh-server.com</strong>, where &#8220;1655&#8243; is any port #), allowing all traffic on the configured applications (Firefox, Pidgin, Mail Clients, etc) to be proxied through the tunneled SSH session, offering a secure and encrypted tunnel over a wireless signal. <a href="http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/12/08/ssh-tunnel-socks-proxy-forwarding-secure-browsing/" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a cute summary on how to do this for those that need it.</a></p>
<p>One caveat: All your DNS lookups will be unencrypted, an easy way to correct this in Firefox is to go to the <strong>about:config</strong> page (just type <strong>about:config</strong> in Firefox&#8217;s address bar) and go down to <strong>network.proxy.socks_remote_dns = false</strong> and change &#8220;false&#8221; to &#8220;true&#8221;, which will force Firefox to use the SSH server (via the encrypted tunnel) for all DNS lookups.</p>
<p><a href="http://onlyubuntu.blogspot.com/2008/05/crack-wpawpa2-wifi-network-using-ubuntu.html" target="_blank">A simple article on how easy it is to hack WPA / WPA2</a>, also known as <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ROT26" target="_blank">ROT-26 security</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lylebackenroth.com/blog/2008/05/10/wpa-wpa2-as-insecure-as-i-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: lylebackenroth.com @ 2010-09-08 00:45:30 -->